CSIS:韩国网络攻击严重性分类框架(2025) 21页

VIP文档

ID:74086

阅读量:0

大小:0.65 MB

页数:21页

时间:2025-07-11

金币:10

上传者:PASHU
JULY 2025
A Cyberattack Severity
Classication Framework
for the Republic of Korea
By Sunha Bae
Introduction
Despite deterrence eorts, cyber threats continue to escalate, highlighting the need for greater
accountability from and cost imposition on malicious actors. The U.S. 2023 National Cybersecurity
Stratey emphasizes imposing costs on malicious actors and reinforcing alliances; the Republic of
Koreas (ROK) 2024 National Cybersecurity Stratey also prioritizes oensive cyber defense and
global cooperation. Since 2018, U.S. Cyber Command’s “Defend Forward” policy has resulted in 40
Hunt Forward operations across 21 countries, exposing threats from major adversaries. Similarly,
the European Unions updated 2023 Cyber Diplomacy Toolbox stresses situational awareness and the
importance of holding persistent threat actors accountable.
Attributing cyberattacks and formulating response strategies are inherently political processes shaped
by national security priorities, diplomatic relations, and geopolitical considerations. Governments
must balance deterrence with escalation risks, ensuring proportionality and international legitimacy. It
is therefore dicult to establish a single, uniform standard for response. Nevertheless, consistent policy
is necessary, as the absence of clear frameworks increases political burdens, delays decisionmaking,
and results in inconsistent responses that can confuse allies.
A national framework for classifying cyberattack severity enhances objectivity, guiding policy decisions
and facilitating mutual understanding between nations. Although South Korea has shown strong political
will to respond to malicious cyber activities, it lacks a clear legal and policy framework for response
procedures. To ll this gap, this paper proposes a Cyberattack Severity Classication Framework (CSCF) to
objectively assess and categorize cyberattacks, supporting informed decisionmaking.
资源描述:

《韩国网络攻击严重性分类框架》由Sunha Bae撰写。报告指出,尽管各国努力威慑,网络威胁仍在升级,因此需要一个客观的框架来评估和分类网络攻击,以支持政治决策、加强成本施加和问责框架,并为国际合作建立基础。 1. **各国网络 incident 评估框架** - **美国**:通过CISS框架评估,整合PPD - 41和NCISS,采用定量加权评分系统。 - **欧盟**:通过NIS指令、CIT和CDT对事件进行分类,共享核心标准,但部分指南是非约束性建议。 - **英国**:通过CMCI和网络法规对网络事件进行分类,评估攻击目标以及经济、运营和社会影响。 - **法国**:采用网络事件严重性分类来支持对恶意活动的适当响应,强调态势感知和国际合作。 - **加拿大**:GC CSEMP使用基于矩阵的系统评估威胁和风险,以确定响应级别。 - **澳大利亚**:CICM根据网络效应的强度和受影响组织的重要性对事件进行分类。 - **中国**:出台了网络安全事件分类指南,并正在制定配套立法,强调控制有害信息。 2. **CSCF框架** - **评估标准**:基于国际框架,聚焦核心标准,分为攻击目标、攻击者意图和影响三大类,共七个子标准,分三个级别。 - **权重**:根据相关调查,影响和损害规模是评估网络攻击的最关键标准,其次是攻击目标。 - **评分与级别**:通过对评估标准打分,将网络事件分为六个严重级别。 - **案例研究**:对过去十年针对韩国和美国的21次网络攻击进行分析,结果表明CSCF与EuRepoC的案例相对排名相似,但EuRepoC的绝对强度和影响分数往往较低。 报告认为,CSCF为评估网络攻击严重性提供了系统框架,有助于提高态势感知,支持韩国政府的政治决策,促进国际理解与合作。

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。
关闭